New ultra-sound technology has been produced which allows 3-D and 4-D images of the fetus, while it is still in the womb. The article:

Pioneering scanning techniques have produced astonishing images from inside the womb which show babies apparently smiling and crying. ... The pictures offer a new insight into foetal behaviour.

The ultra-sound scanning techniques capture images which show the foetuses yawn, blink, suck their fingers and seem to cry and smile. ... His (the doctor who developed the technology) pictures reveal foetuses moving their limbs at just eight weeks. The new techniques, known as 3D and 4D scanning, allow for far more detailed examination of the foetus.

"There are many questions that can now be investigated," said Prof Campbell. "Do babies with genetic problems such as Downs Syndrome have the same pattern of activity as normal babies? Does the foetus smile because it is happy, or cry because it has been disturbed by some event in the womb? Why does a foetus blink when we assume it's dark inside the uterus?"

I have a question of my own: Why don't we put an end to unborn child-killing, given the fact science has proven time and again that these fetuses are viable human beings?

Every expectant mother should be required by law to get one of these scans prior to getting an abortion. If they ever were required, I'd bet the abortion rate would fall drastically. Because Planned Parenthood would no longer be able to tell young teenagers that it's just a lump of tissue — it's not a baby.

By Darren Weeks

What is it about the date, September 11th, that is so special to the diabolical ruling class? It is a date that they apparently find very appealing to launch their acts of terrorism upon the world.

It is only recently that the date has forever been etched into the minds and hearts of Americans. However, the truth is that 9/11 has been an important part of the globalists' plans for many years.

I don't think it was an accident, by the way, that our emergency dispatch phone system — which was developed and funded by federal tax dollars — has the phone number 9-1-1. Why that number? And why the eleventh of September for so many other historical dates of significance?

Consider the following:

• September 11, 1941

— Exactly 60 years prior to the time it's "attack" would be used as a pretense to start a world war, ground was broken to build the five-sided structure called the Pentagon. The building was to house the War Department, which would later become known as the U.S. Department of Defense.

• September 11, 1973

— The U.S. ruling elite backed Chilean Army commander-in-chief Augusto Pinochet to overthrow the democratically-elected government of Salvador Allende in Chile. Last year, Tito Tricot wrote in the Guardian of the coup.

It is not a matter of comparing sorrow and pain, but for the past year (following the World Trade Center "attack") the US media has tried to convince us that north American lives are worth more than other people's lives. After all, we are from the third world, citizens of underdeveloped countries who deserve to be arrested, tortured and killed. How else are we interpret the fact that the military coup in our country was planned in the United States?

The truth is that no US president ever shed a tear for our dead; no US politician ever sent a flower to our widows. The US government and media use different standards to measure suffering. It is precisely this hypocrisy and these double standards that make us sick, especially when on such a symbolic day for Chileans, the president of Chile, Ricardo Lagos, attended a memorial service at the United States embassy where the ambassador, William Brownfield, stated that "people who hate the United States must be controlled, arrested or eliminated."

In what kind of a world are we living? Can we stand idly by while in the name of the fight against terrorism countries are bombed or invaded by the US war machine? I think not, especially because, irrespective of the horror of the World Trade Centre attacks, the US has no moral right to impose its will on our continent. After all, we in Latin America have ample experience with US terrorist tactics. In our continent alone 90,000 people disappeared as a direct result of the operation of the School of the Americas and US "counterinsurgency" policies — 30 times more than the victims of the World Trade Centre.

One cannot — and should not — attempt to quantify suffering, but we do have the right to denounce this double standard. We also have the right to question President Lagos' assertion that "for the youth of today what happened in 1973 is part of history, which means we must undertake the task of looking to the future." Only a few hours after the president's speech, thousands of people — mostly young people — took over parts of Santiago and other Chilean cities to express their true feelings about this fateful day in Chile's history. They organised demonstrations, candle-lit vigils, concerts, meetings, seminars and put up barricades to defend themselves from the police.

It was a way of saying: Neither the United States nor anybody has the right to steal our memory. No one has the right to steal our day, for September the 11th, 1973 is marked in our hearts with tears.

Yet, steal the day is exactly what the U.S. elitists did. They had already claimed it as their date.

• September 11, 1980

— Cuban diplomat Félix García Rodríguez was assassinated on the streets of New York City, while driving past the United Nations building. Jean-Guy Allard, writing for the Cuban publication, Granma International, comments:

One bullet hit him in the neck, and he lost consciousness. His car hit another vehicle coming in the opposite direction.

The killers stopped their car, the one with the machine gun got out and shot Félix again, this time in the head.

That man’s name is Pedro Remón, a terrorist from the Omega 7 group. The driver of the car was Eduardo "Omar" Arocena, head of Omega 7 and author of a very long list of attempts.

That day, "Omar" was celebrating the sixth anniversary of his organization. And the first murder of a UN diplomat was an exploit celebrated by the Cuban-American mafia capos in Miami who blindly supported his act of terrorism, along with the blessing of the CIA and the FBI ...

Secretary of State Ed Muskie called it a reprehensible act and asked for all the relevant federal agencies as well as the New York police department to cooperate in the investigation.

The man responsible for U.S. foreign policy stated that terrorism was to be condemned in all its forms and eradicated.

Donald McHenry, Washington’s ambassador to the UN called the crime a blot on the United States.

Nevertheless, both Muskie and McHenry refrained from specifically condemning the anti-Cuban terrorism sponsored, as was well known, by the country’s very own intelligence services and to a large degree tolerated by the federal police. ...

According to information declassified by the FBI in 1993, Omega 7 was a Miami-based terrorist organization founded on September 11, 1974 by Eduardo "Omar" Arocena, with the backing of two fanatical Cuban-American groups: the Cuban Nationalist Movement and the Martí Insurrection Movement.

Assuming that all of the facts in this account are presented accurately, who in the U.S. government wanted Félix García Rodríguez dead? And for what reason? For whom was the Omega 7 group working? Certainly there was a motive for the diplomat's death. Is it a coincidence that the Omega 7 group was founded to enact their rampage of terrorism on exactly the same date that would, years later, be remembered as the date of terror? Why did they choose September 11th to found the terrorist organzation? And then choose September 11th again to execute this man?

September 11, 1991 — George Herbert Walker Bush gave his speech to Congress, announcing the beginning of the first Gulf War.

We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a new world order — can emerge.

And ten years later, the new world order did emerge. At least the plan for global domination was drafted for the new Bush presidency. The only missing piece to the puzzle was that the election that would put Bush into power, hadn't taken place yet. But, not to fear — they had that all planned out too.

• September 10, 1997

— Okay, it's not the 11th, but it's close enough. And considering its relevancy to what is happening today, it is remarkable.

On September 15, 1997, a military publication called the Times of the Ark-La-Tex went to press with an interview with then Defense Secretary William S. Cohen. Here's the article:

Terrorism is escalating to the point that Americans soon may have to choose between civil liberties and more intrusive means of protection, Defense Secretary William S. Cohen says.

The nation's defense chief told the Army Times he once considered the chilling specter of armored vehicles surrounding civilian hotels or government buildings to block out terrorists as strictly an overseas phenomenon. But no longer.

It could happen here, Cohen said he concluded after eight months of studying threats under the Pentagon microscope. Free-lance terrorists with access to deadly chemical and biological bombs are "going to change the way in which the American people view security in our own country," he predicted in a Sept. 10 interview.

As you read the above paragraph, notice that Mr. Cohen didn't say that the terrorists might change the way we live, or that if we don't take precautions, this may happen. He said that these "free-lance terrorists" were "going to change the way in which American people view security." How did Mr. Cohen know that? Does Mr. Cohen have a crystal ball, or was he privy to the plan, and was providing a glimpse into what he and the others in the shameful halls of power had on their agenda?

What a "coincidence" that exactly 4 years and 1 day prior to the World Trade Center and Pentagon "attacks", the U.S. Secretary of Defense was warning us of impending terrorist attacks! Attacks that would mandate our swapping our freedom, in favor of Big Brother's protection! And he allegedly knew this because of his time, spent studying the threats. And he studied them at the same Pentagon that would be "attacked" exactly four years later — almost to the day!

It's just too bad that no one at the Pentagon, FBI, CIA, NSA, NORAD or any other entity of the federal government was studying the issue of terrorism on the day we really needed it. The ever-shrewd Mr. Cohen was no longer on the watch. And neither was anyone else. It's almost as if they all went to sleep. And they talk about the "sleeper cells" of terrorism!

The American people are told that the government didn't see the attacks coming. Yet, William Cohen knew of them. A whole four years in advance! And he was preparing the military. But for what?

We are supposed to believe that our federal government, who wishes for us to surrender our liberty so that they can protect us, will do so when the time comes. I sincerely hope that the reader is starting to see the folly of surrendering freedoms (and that includes privacy) for any reason — especially for the purpose of affording government "protectors" the opportunity to play nanny. Because what happens when the protector becomes the aggressor?

The more powerful you make government, the more aggressive it becomes. Ultimately, if left unabated, it will increase its size and scope, until it controls and dictates every area of your life.

We are already seeing that take place in America. We are seeing cameras appearing on every street corner in America. Many of these cameras are connected to computers with data bases, running facial recognition software. And as innocent civilians walk the streets, their faces — unbeknownst to them — are being captured in a data base, and compared to thousands of criminals. And if there is a match, that person could be detained. Already, there have been people questioned by police just because the computer says they look like a criminal.

Is this the kind of "free" America that you envision?

How about an America where you cannot venture into public without your papers? They were attempting to get a national I.D. card implemented prior to September 11, 2001. The "terrorist attacks" very conveniently gave them another "opportunity" to make the case that a national I.D. card is necessary to keep the American people safe.

Once the momentum exists for more government intrusion into your life, these creatures will stop at nothing to penetrate every area of your private life. It will no longer be enough to merely know what you say, what you purchase, or the web pages you browse. No, these hellish fiends have to get into your head. They must know your very thoughts.

The Times interview continues with Cohen calling for increased government penetration into "terrorist organizations". At no point is the word "terrorism" ever defined by the article or Mr. Cohen. Also, he calls for the U.S. military to become involved in domestic law enforcement, a measure that would require changing the Posse Comitatus laws. Then, we could have military police patrolling our streets just like every normal Communist country.

Cohen said terrorism would be a top priority in five new areas he plans to focus on now that he has wrapped up his first defense budget, the quadrennial review of the military and a new four-year defense strategy.

As I've already stated, Cohen was interviewed on September 10th, 1997. The four year "review" and "defense strategy", which he said he began at that time, lasting four years, would end exactly on September 10, 2001 — the day before twin tower and Pentagon "attacks" — just in time to have the military ready to start the war on terrorism. What an incredible coincidence!

It seems to me that his strategy worked. Because just as it ended, the CIA, FBI, and NORAD all turned their backs as not one, not two, not three, but four aircraft were supposedly "hijacked", and crashed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field outside of Pittsburgh. And you're going to forfeit your freedoms so this government can protect you?

• September 2000

— A secret report was written for Dick Cheney (now vice- president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century (pdf format), was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC). The British newspaper, The Sunday Herald, in an article entitled Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President, described the document as a "secret blueprint for U.S. global domination" which "reveals that President Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure 'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001."

If you want proof that the attacks of September 11th were orchestrated by our own government, you need look no further. The report was written in September 2000 — exactly a year before it was executed. September 11th was the 911 emergency day that they would put their plan for global domination into fruition by killing innocent Americans by the thousands.

Still having a hard time believing me? Do you still think that the government cares too much about you to commit such a dastardly deed?

Then check out these declassified Defense Department documents (pdf), which prove that the U.S. government planned to terrorize its own American citizens as a justification to start a war with Cuba in 1962. The plan, which was given the innocuous title, Operation Northwoods, was never carried out. Yet it serves to educate us that if the opportunity doesn't exist to accomplish their agenda, they will create the opportunity. And with no regard for human casualties and suffering.

And that brings us to:

• September 11, 2001

— The "terrorist attacks" on the twin towers, and the Pentagon.

They wrote the plan, created the pretense, executed the war as an answer to the pretense, and are presently in the process of sealing the deal. The new world order that George Herbert Walker Bush spoke so highly of during his presidency, is now being finalized during his son's presidency. Poetic, isn't it?

And as the planes struck the towers, the date was again September 11th. And even though most people could look at their calendars and see 2001, the transpiring events more accurately reflected Orwell's 1984.

What is it about the eleventh of September that the elite love so much? Is their a special holiday of which we know nothing?