audio post — My comments about the ongoing 9/11 commission.

 audio post — The bomb blasts which rocked Madrid, Spain last Thursday, March 11th, happened exactly 911 days following the date of the twin tower and Pentagon devastation in the United States.

This is yet another interesting "coincidence" relating to September 11th. We can now add this symbolism to the long list of "coincidences" involving the incident which served as the springboard to the war on terror.

Most notably on the list of interesting irony, is the fact that George Herbert Walker Bush, the 41st president of the United States, addressed the nation and a joint session of Congress on the evening the first Gulf War conflict began. He spoke about using the opportunity that the conflict offered to establish a "New World Order". The date of his speech was September 11th, 1990 — exactly eleven years prior to the so-called "terrorist attacks", and the next "opportunity" to advance the globalists' New World Order agenda.

The Global Elite cannot seem to help themselves when it comes to working their occult symbolism into their terrorist actions. It seems they love to mock their victims.

Whenever a politician tells you they need to pass a bill "for the children", you'd better brace yourself — chances are, your freedoms are about to be abducted.

There are many measures that have been passed throughout the years in the name of "the children". Nearly all of them thrust government deeper into your life. And more government means less individual liberty.

Take, for instance, the nation-wide Amber Alert system.

The Amber Alert originated as a program in Texas in 1996 after 9-year-old Amber Hagerman was abducted and murdered. It was apparently decided that had the public been recruited to help look for her abductor, she might have been saved.

Following that incident, police began working with TV and radio stations in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, to get word out fast when a child was abducted. The program later spread to the entire state, then to California, and finally Congress introduced a measure that would take the program nation-wide.

When the Amber Alert bill (S.151) was first introduced on Capitol Hill, it was only 14 sections long. By the final draft, several sections had been added to the bill making it over six times its original size!

One of the additions was a section to the bill called the "Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy (RAVE) Act", or in official terms, "The Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act of 2003". The legislation's supposed intent is to target dance parties or "Raves" in which the utilization of drugs such as ecstasy are prevalent.

But the RAVE Act makes it easier for the federal government to prosecute innocent business owners for the drug crimes of their customers — even if the business owner had taken measures to discourage drug-use in their establishments.

It places into jeopardy bar and restaurant owners, as well the owners of hotels or nightclubs. Even concert promoters or the owners of stadiums, where events are booked, could be prosecuted for the drug crimes of third party individuals.

The act applies to all public gatherings, regardless of genre. But it also could be used against landlords and real estate managers, who have clientele who possess illegal substances.

And even though it targets property owners who "knowingly" permit illegal drug use on their premises, how can a business owner prove they had no knowledge of an offense?

In short, it unfairly shifts the responsibility of drug-enforcement and community policing to the private property owner, while punishing the same for the crimes of the occupants of their property. And it gives greater discretion to prosecutors, who could use it to target people or events which do not meet with their approval.

It isn't difficult to imagine how this little section of the Amber Alert bill could be misused on a politically incorrect event like, for instance, a gun show. Fines could be levied against the organizers of the event, as well as the owners of the building in which the show took place, based upon an accusation that illegal drug use was present among the patronage.

Prior to its installment into the Amber Alert bill, the RAVE Act had proven itself to be rather controversial. It had failed to pass a single committee in either the House or the Senate. Then, Senator Joseph "Stalin" Biden slipped it into the S.151 as a last-minute attachment. The entire bill was then passed by both houses, and signed into law by President Bush.

Already, the RAVE Act has been used for political purposes — to squelch freedom of speech and interfere with private meetings. On May 30, 2003 a meeting was planned at the Eagle Lodge in Billings, Montana. The event was a fundraiser for a campaign to change the state's medical marijuana law. The managers of the lodge decided to cancel the event when a Drug Enforcement Administration agent told them they could be fined $250,000 if anyone smoked marijuana during the event.

The War On Drugs has accomplished very little in the way of eliminating illegal drug use. In fact, illegal drug use continues to soar, while small time offenders are punished harshly. And innocent property owners must now worry about being fined or imprisoned under a bill that was supposedly intended to protect the children from abduction.

The next time you witness an Amber Alert on TV, a highway sign, or on the radio, remember that our children must be protected from more than just child abductors. Amber's dirty secret is another demonstration that we must always remain on watch to guard against those who would take away our rights and that of future generations.

In other words, we must defend liberty — for the children.

Sexual assault cases among the military are increasing at rapid levels.

A new survey of the Pacific Air Forces released Thursday, found serious flaws in the handling of sexual assault cases. Pacific commander Gen. William Begert conducted a five month study which uncovered 106 accused offenders involved in 92 rapes from 2001 to 2003.

"What we found is we have the problem, as you would expect," he told the Colorado Springs Gazette. Gen. Begert described the results as disappointing, but "not terribly surprising".

Indeed, a thinking person would expect that having women in the military would lead to many problems — including cases of sexual harassment, assault, and even rape.

There have been at least 56 cases of rape or sexual assault reported since 1993 at the Air Force Academy, which is located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. That prompted a shakeup in leadership there last year.

And the Air Force Times reports that "sexual assault continues to be a sensitive topic in the military; Pentagon officials recently said there have been 106 reports of sexual assaults among troops deployed in the Middle East over the past 14 months."

The government answer to the problem of female sexual assault in the military, is to promote education and sensitivity training among their male counterparts. It never really addresses the real issue — that women don't belong in the military.

I'm not chauvinistic. I believe that a woman should receive the same dignity and respect that any man receives. And when performing the same type of work, opportunities and pay should be indiscriminatory.

That being said, however, common sense dictates that there are differences between men and women. Hence, there are certain types of work that are inappropriate for one gender or the other. The military is an example of a "career" that should not be afforded to women.

There are sanitary issues with respect to menstruation, and also the inability to concentrate on the mission when the associated cramps become a problem. Women are generally not built as physically strong as men, so lifting heavy equipment may become more of a problem.

And, of course, there is the not-so-small issue of hormones.

It isn't difficult to see that is a created crisis, designed to demoralize and weaken the military. If you place a woman in the midst of numerous sexually-starved males, there are going to be some that will take advantage of the situation and make a victim out of her. That doesn't make it right, but unfortunately, it's a reality.

When the issue of women in the military came to the forefront, many of us were predicting that these types of incidents would take place. And thus they have.

It has always been the job of the strong male to protect the weaker female. The male is created to be the bread-winner, the hunter, the warrior. That is why God created the man to be stronger. It was His plan to have the man be the defender and provider of the home.

The female was designed by God to be a nurturer, the family care-giver, the homemaker. She has a softer voice, a certain tenderness, and the capacity and equipment to nurse the young.

Modern-day feminism asserts that there are no differences between the male and female. To suggest that there are differences, they contend, is to be discriminatory. But history proves that in the end, the fate of women is not improved after the feminists have their way.

The radical feminist movement campaigned for the "right" to kill their unborn children. And since the 1973 activist Supreme Court sided with them, millions of unborn children — many of them women — have been the victims of murder inside the womb. Additionally, many women have had abortions only to have the reality of it haunt them the rest of their lives.

Indeed, there are many cases in which complications from abortion have resulted that were not dealt with quickly, due to the fact that parental notification laws were designed to "protect" the minor female's "right to choose". These are dirty details that you don't see in the controlled media.

Today, women have the "opportunity" to fight, bleed, and die on battlefields right along with the men. They are equally entitled to their uniform and rank. And they are verbally assaulted, groped, sodomized, and raped. This is justice, according to the militant feminist movement and cultural Marxists.

Feminism sought to make them equals, and has again made them victims.