I remember several years ago hearing that Gutenberg’s movable type printing press was the world’s greatest invention. It gave mankind widespread literacy, brought Westernized nations to an understanding of human sovereignty, lessened the brutal and dictatorial powers of corrupt church leadership and their personal versions of “The Truth,” and gave objectivity to the common man’s reality.
I tend to agree that this invention was perhaps the greatest benefit for all mankind. On that note, I also believe that tell-a-vision - bar none - was the most damaging invention of all time, as it took mankind out of books and reasoning and into full-blown propagandistic vulnerability. Today, and particularly in Western society, we are fast re-emerging as a people again believing in myths created by aristocrats. Once again, we find ourselves believing there are monsters around every corner.
Aristocrats have us believing that our planet is dying, pandemics are forthcoming, nuclear annihilation is probable, and that we must think and do exactly as they tell us to do in order to survive. Sorry, but this is just all too Nazi Germany for me, as in been there - done that…
Aristocrats believe in supremacy. They always have and they still do. Aristocrats despise the common man and consider him to be a lesser species, which is why commoners have been steadfastly and continually used as guinea pigs for aristocrats and their inventions. Case in point, part of an article by Anton Chaitkin, titled Population Control and the U.N.:
John D. Rockefeller created the family-run Rockefeller Foundation in 1909. By 1929 he had placed $300 million of the family's controlling interest in the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey (now called Exxon) to the account of the Foundation.Now, one would have to turn off the tell-a-vision set and read this article to make the not so subtle connections between corporate power, depopulation strategies, the United Nations, and the so-called women’s movement - all of which are solely devoted to one and only one mission, which is the on-going depopulation of “commoners.”
The Foundation's money created the medical specialty known as Psychiatric Genetics. For the new experimental field, the Foundation reorganized medical teaching in Germany, creating and thenceforth continuously directing the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity. The Rockefellers' chief executive of these institutions was the fascist Swiss psychiatrist Ernst Rudin, who was assisted by his protégés Otmar Verschuer and Franz J. Kallmann.
In 1932, the British-led eugenics movement designated the Rockefellers' Dr. Rudin as the president of the worldwide Eugenics Federation. The movement called for the killing or sterilization of people whose heredity made them a public burden. - The Racial Laws - A few months later, Hitler took over Germany and the Rockefeller-Rudin apparatus became a section of the Nazi state.
The regime appointed Rudin head of the Racial Hygiene Society. Rudin and his staff, as part of the Task Force of Heredity Experts chaired by SS chief Heinrich Himmler, drew up the sterilization law. Described as an American Model law, it was adopted in July 1933 and proudly printed in the September 1933 Eugenical News (USA) with Hitler's signature. The Rockefeller group drew up other race laws, which were also based on existing Virginia statutes.
Otmar Verschuer and his assistant Josef Mengele together wrote reports for special courts which enforced Rudin's racial purity law against cohabitation of Aryans and non-Aryans. The “T4'” unit of the Hitler Chancery, based on psychiatrists led by Rudin and his staff, cooperated in creating propaganda films to sell mercy killing (euthanasia) to German citizens.
Under the Nazis, the German chemical company I.G. Farben and Rockefeller's Standard Oil of New Jersey were effectively a single firm, merged in hundreds of cartel arrangements. I.G. Farben was led, up until 1937, by the Warburg family, Rockefeller's partner in banking and in the design of Nazi German eugenics. Following the German invasion of Poland in 1939, Standard Oil pledged to keep the merger with I.G. Farben going even if the U.S. entered the war.
This was exposed in 1942 by Sen. Harry Truman's investigating committee, and President Roosevelt took hundreds of legal measures during the war to stop the Standard-I.G. Farben cartel from supplying the enemy war machine. In 1940-41, I.G. Farben built a gigantic factory at Auschwitz in Poland, to utilize the Standard Oil/I.G. Farben patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal.
The SS was assigned to guard the Jewish and other inmates and select for killing those who were unfit for I.G. Farben slave labor. Standard-Germany president Emil Helfferich testified after the war that Standard Oil funds helped pay for SS guards at Auschwitz. In 1940, six months after the notorious Standard-I.G. meeting, European Rockefeller Foundation official Daniel O'Brian wrote to the Foundation's chief medical officer Alan Gregg that "it would be unfortunate if it was chosen to stop research which has no relation to war issues"--so the Foundation continued financing Nazi "psychiatric research" during the war.
In 1936, Rockefeller's Dr. Franz Kallmann interrupted his study of hereditary degeneracy and immigrated to America because he was half-Jewish. Kallmann went to New York and established the Medical Genetics Department of the New York State Psychiatric Institute. The Scottish Rite of Freemasonry published Kallman's study of over 1,000 cases of schizophrenia, which tried to prove its hereditary basis. In the book, Kallmann thanked his long-time boss and mentor Rudin.
Kallmann's book, published in 1938 in the USA and Nazi Germany, was used by the T4 unit as a rationalization to begin in 1939 the murder of mental patients and various "defective" people, perhaps most of them children. Gas and lethal injections were used to kill 250,000 under this program, in which the staffs for a broader murder program were desensitized and trained.
- Dr. Mengele... - In 1943, Otmar Verschuer's assistant Josef Mengele was made medical commandant of Auschwitz. As wartime director of Rockefeller's Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity in Berlin, Verschuer secured funds for Mengele's experiments at Auschwitz from the German Research Council.
Verschuer wrote a progress report to the Council: “My co-researcher in this research is my assistant the anthropologist and physician Mengele. He is serving as Hauptstuermfuehrer and camp doctor in the concentration camp Auschwitz....
With the permission of the Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler, anthropological research is being undertaken on the various racial groups in the concentration camps and blood samples will be sent to my laboratory for investigation.
Mengele prowled the railroad lines leading into Auschwitz, looking for twins--a favorite subject of psychiatric geneticists. On arrival at Mengele's experimental station, twins filled out a detailed questionnaire from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.
There were daily drawings of blood for Verschuer's "specific protein" research. Needles were injected into eyes for work on eye color. There were experimental blood transfusions and infections. Organs and limbs were removed, sometimes without anesthetics. Sex changes were attempted. Females were sterilized, males were castrated. Thousands were murdered and their organs, eyeballs, heads, and limbs were sent to Verschuer and the Rockefeller group at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.
In 1946, Verschuer wrote to the Bureau of Human Heredity in London, asking for help in continuing his "scientific research." - Facelift - In 1947, the Bureau of Human Heredity moved from London to Copenhagen.
The new Danish building for this was built with Rockefeller money. The first International Congress in Human Genetics following World War II was held at this Danish institute in 1956. By that time, Verschuer was a member of the American Eugenics Society, then indistingishable from Rockefeller's Population Council. Dr. Kallmann helped save Verschuer by testifying in his denazification proceedings.
Dr. Kallmann created the American Society of Human Genetics, which organized the "Human Genome Project"--a current $3 billion physical multiculturalism effort. Kallmann was a director of the American Eugenics Society in 1952 and from 1954 to 1965.
In the 1950s, the Rockefellers reorganized the U.S. eugenics movement in their own family offices, with spin-off population control and abortion groups. The Eugenics Society changed its name to the Society for the Study of Social Biology, its current name.
The Rockefeller Foundation had long financed the eugenics movement in England, apparently repaying Britain for the fact that British capital and an Englishman-partner had started old John D. Rockefeller out in his Oil Trust. In the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England adopted what they called Crypto-eugenics, stating in their official reports that they would do eugenics through means and instruments not labeled as eugenics.
With support from the Rockefellers, the Eugenics Society (England) set up a sub-committee called the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which for 12 years had no other address than the Eugenics Society. This, then, is the private, international apparatus which has set the world up for a global holocaust, under the UN flag.
Now, consider the following by Phillip Longman of the National Strategy Forum - a not-for-profit outfit in Illinois:
A global depopulation of children has already begun. The trend started in Europe, where there are today 27 percent fewer children age 0-4 than there were in 1950. Now, for the world as a whole, the supply of children age 0-4 is lower than it was in 1990. By 2050, according to United Nations projections, there will be 35 million fewer children under age 5 in the world than there are today.A few thoughts come to mind after the reading of these two essays - the first being that America may be the least purely bred nation of people on the planet, and secondly that as a highly and naturally multi-cultural nation, we may be slated for extinction by the world’s aristocratic elites. After all, this nation of mixed cultures is also the nation that provided the most benefits and the highest levels of individual freedom to the American mutt. Surely, this must be an affront to the pure-bred elites of the world, and bloodlines continue to stand at the forefront of the on-going eugenic science missions of the world’s elites. They don’t like mutts - particularly breeding mutts.
Forecasts by the United Nations and others show total world population could well decline during the lifetime of people now in their 40s and 50s, and is very likely to do so before today’s children reach retirement age. What population growth remains ahead will come almost exclusively from increases in the numbers of elders, whose ranks are expected to swell by 1.2 billion by 2050, even as the number of children declines. Once these elders pass, population will begin falling extremely fast.
The primary reason is the unprecedented fall in fertility rates over the last generation that is now spreading to every corner of the globe. In both hemispheres, in nations rich and poor, in Christian, Taoist, Confucian, Hindu and especially Islamic countries, one broad social trend holds constant at the beginning of the 21st century: As more and more of the world’s population moves to urban areas where children have little economic value, and as women gain in education and economic opportunity, people are producing fewer and fewer children.
Today, global fertility rates are half what they were in 1972. No industrialized nation still produces enough children to sustain its population over time, or to prevent rapid population aging. Meanwhile, the steepest drops in fertility, and the most rapid rates of population aging, are now occurring in the developing world, where many nations are now growing old before they get rich.
Today, when Americans think of Mexico, for example, they think of televised images of desperate, unemployed youths swimming the Rio Grande or slipping through border fences. Yet because Mexican fertility rates have dropped so dramatically, Mexico’s population of children under age 15 has declined by more than half a million in just the last 5 years. Today, there are 33.1 million Mexicans under age 15; by 2050 that number will drop to 23.2 million, according to U.N. projections. On current trends, Mexico will not only be a less youthful country than the U.S. by mid-century, its population will be older than Japan’s is today.
The same is true for much of the rest of Latin America, and it portends large changes in immigration patterns. Already, despite an open border and a large difference in living standards, net immigration from Puerto Rico to the mainland of the United States has dropped to zero, as falling birthrates have allowed the number of jobs in Puerto Rico to keep up with the growth of population.
The first order effect of declining fertility is generally positive. Many economists believe, for example, that falling birth rates helped make possible the economic boom that occurred first in Japan, and then in many other Asian nations, beginning in the 1960s. As the relative number of children declined, so did the burden of their dependency, thereby freeing up more resources for investment and adult consumption.
Yet even if declining fertility at first brings a “demographic dividend,” that dividend eventually has to be repaid if the trend continues. At first there are fewer children to feed, clothe and educate, leaving more for adults to enjoy. But soon enough there are fewer productive workers as well, while there are also more and more dependent elderly, each of whom consumes far more resources, mostly in the form of healthcare, than children or young adults do. In the United States, for example, total per capita consumption for households headed by a person over 65 is 39 percent higher than for households headed by a person under 25. Meanwhile, per capita federal spending on persons 65 and over is seven times greater than per capita spending on children-a gap that continues to widen.
Current trends in fertility will not only vastly reduce the number of workers available to support each retiree, they are also likely to create a far more conservative, and indeed fundamentalist, future. This is because what children are being born tend to come disproportionately from people who reject the modern, secular values that make small families increasingly the norm. In Europe and the U.S., as well as in Israel, the rest of the Middle East and beyond, there is a strong correlation between adherence to fundamentalist Christian, Islamic or Judaic religious values and high fertility. The result is an emerging world in which the highly pro-natal and patriarchal values of these Abrahamic religions become dominant as the secularist segments of society fail to reproduce themselves.
In the United States, for example, fertility rates are 12 percent higher in states that supported George W. Bush in the last presidential election than in the more liberal, secular states that supported his opponent, John Kerry. Indeed, if the Kerry states seceded from the Bush states and formed a new nation, that nation’s fertility rate would be just 1.8 children per woman, or 13 percent below the level needed to replace the population. In a bastion of Democratic secularism like Seattle, there are nearly 45 percent more dogs than children. In a stronghold of religious conservatism like Salt Lake City, there are 18 percent more children than dogs.
Secular and progressive elements in every nation are not producing enough children to replace themselves. Polling data analyzed by demographer Ron J. Lesthaeghe shows, for example, that Europeans who distrust the military, who seldom if ever go to church, who support environmentalism, minority rights, legalized abortion, and other “progressive” issues are far less likely to have children, or to ever have children, than those who take opposing views. As the comedian Dick Cavett once quipped, “If your parents never had children, chances are you won’t as well.” It’s a funny thought, but one with increasingly profound implications for the future of global culture and politics.
A decline in birthrates might at first seem beneficial to the environment, but this is not necessarily so. To begin with, as society’s age, the ever-higher cost of healthcare and pensions can easily consume resources that would otherwise be available for investment in cleaner energy and increased energy efficiency. In the United States, official projections show the cost of just Social Security and Medicare’s Hospital Insurance program alone will require payroll taxes in the range of 25 percent by 2050.
Falling birthrates may also erode the market case for investments in cleaner, more efficient technology by reducing the depletion rates for oil, coal and other carbon-based forms of energy. A world of 3 billion persons living in sprawling McMansions and driving gas-guzzling SUV’s will make more pollution than a world of 9 billion persons who, because they have depleted carbon-based energy supplies more rapidly, have learned to shun sprawl, eliminated auto dependency, and developed alternative, cleaner forms of energy. Japan is a world leader in energy efficiency precisely because its high population density and dependence on foreign oil make investments in energy-saving systems like mass transit and high-speed rail not only economically feasible, but economically necessary.
A society in which the average family has few children, and in which many people are childless, also puts an over-sized “foot print” on the environment because it requires a very large number of housing units. An aging society is also likely to be more risk adverse, less entrepreneurial, and less committed to education, thereby making technological solutions to problems like global warming less likely. Finally, with fewer workers to support each retiree, and with each retiree consuming more and more healthcare, economies will have to run faster and harder to finance the burden.
On that note, multi-cultural enforcement is, indeed, fascinating, for multi-culturalism is out of the question for global aristocrats. They do not intermix with other bloodlines, nor do they tend to associate with such rabble. America, on the other hand, has intermixed the Irish, Italian, African, Scottish, English, German, Canadian, and Mexican nations for two+ centuries. In fact, all nations have intermixed into American people and the American landscape. My family is home to 4 nationalities and two religions, and it is more than likely that 90% of all American people are also of mixed lineages. We are a vastly multi-cultural nation. No one needed to suggest or pretend that we were not. But to eugenicists, their elite sponsors, and their historical traditions, this is a highly unbecoming condition. In fact, it makes American people genetically and highly undesireable.
Then, when you combine the corporate powers, financial assets, political, military, technological, and pharmaceutical powers of the global elites, one can begin to fathom the vulnerability and loathsome condition of the American public - a public that is loathsome to elites by genetic nature.
American people must always remember that the sciences of eugenics were developed to depopulate undesirable genetics. This is the history of Planned Parenthood, royalty, big pharma, wars, and land confiscators. Limit, if not delete, the rabble. Makes one wonder about the desperate conditions and illnesses in Africa - the ones that never improve - no? And also the illnesses of soldiers - the ones that are never treatable, and the mass drugging of our senior population. And then there are the forthcoming and highly advertised pandemic, mandatory vaccines, flu shots, and the mental health industry invasion into the lives of women and public school children - and all at the massive, massive profits of the pharmaceutical industries - the same industries that experimented upon multi-millions in past decades. Hmmm.
And then there are the 40-50 million American children removed from the bodies of American women in the last 3.5 decades. Let me repeat that number 40-50 MILLION American children. That’s a whole lot of depopulation - and under the guise of progressive rights for women. Do you not think there is a limit to genocide, or do you think genocide is only definable by lobbyists, politicians, women’s organizations, and/or the United Nations and their “partners?” This happens to be one of the largest mass graveyards in human history - and that’s just the U.S. graveyard. Wouldn’t you love to know how many babies have been eliminated worldwide? Wouldn’t you love to know the real reason why? Try depopulation on for size - the depopulation mandated by the United Nations, women’s organizations, and environmentalists - the groups tied to their financial teeth to foundation money, or in translation, global elites - and that depopulation will not include lowering the numbers of global elites. That is a guarantee.
So, the next time you hear about your school children learning about multi-culturalism, be not fooled. America is depopulating as we speak, and once the baby-boomers have been made sick enough to die, and the secularists continue to rule with Socialistic fists, America will be very, very unpopulated - minus the selected and genetically desired working class chosen by the elites to work for slave wages.
And one last thought - American women, beware. Depopulation means abject control of you and your reproductive capabilities. Since 25+ million of you are now taking anti-depressants, don’t be surprised when you are no longer designated as fit to reproduce. I suggest you have no idea what you gave up when you chose to seek “therapy.” And remember, the mental health corporations are in your children’s schools as we speak. Your kids are next.
Please read The Cultural Devastation of American Women. The brutal truth is no longer avoidable. The book is available at www.newswithviews.com, www.amazon.com, and www.barnesandnoble.com. Every woman you know you will see in this book. Spend some fiat reserve notes, and buy a gift of truth this “holiday” season. No electronics this year, folks. Buy books that matter for the people you love.
Labels: Nancy Levant






